welcome to PEDRRAM LAW, PLC.
at pedram law, losing is not an option
A rideshare accident attorney investigates the crash, sends preservation letters to Uber or Lyft within days to compel trip data and GPS records, analyzes which of the three insurance coverage tiers applied at the moment of the crash, identifies every available source of recovery up to $1,000,000 in commercial coverage, and fights for the full value of your injuries. According to the California Public Utilities Commission, transportation network companies completed over 100 million trips in California in a recent reporting year, and rideshare crash claims have grown sharply alongside ridership.
Most rideshare crash victims have no idea their coverage depends entirely on the driver’s app status at the moment of impact. By the time they call an attorney, the rideshare insurer has often already pushed the claim into a lower coverage tier. You do not have to figure this out alone.
Pedram Law represents rideshare accident victims across California on a contingency basis. Nima Pedram and Silvia Gonzalez have recovered $1,000,000 in a slip and fall, $600,000 in a car accident, $500,000 in a wrongful death case, and significant results across catastrophic injury matters statewide. Free case evaluation. No fees unless we win.
our wide range of practice areas
WHAT WE CAN OFFER YOU.
Get in touch today and an experienced Pedram Law attorney will help you receive the.
Contact UsGet in touch today and an experienced Pedram Law attorney will help you receive the.
Contact UsGet in touch today and an experienced Pedram Law attorney will help you receive the.
Contact UsGet in touch today and an experienced Pedram Law attorney will help you receive the.
Contact UsGet in touch today and an experienced Pedram Law attorney will help you receive the.
Contact UsGet in touch today and an experienced Pedram Law attorney will help you receive the.
Contact Us
at pedram law, losing is not an option
at pedram law, losing is not an option
Yes. Rideshare cases involve insurance structures that no other auto case touches. Uber and Lyft maintain three distinct coverage tiers depending on whether the app was off, on but waiting for a ride, or actively transporting a passenger. The trigger between tiers determines whether you are dealing with the driver’s personal insurance, a limited rideshare contingent policy, or a full $1,000,000 commercial liability policy. Both Uber and Lyft fight aggressively to push claims into the lowest available tier. Without an attorney who knows the coverage map and can prove app status at the moment of the crash, you settle against the wrong policy.
Pedram Law evaluates every rideshare accident case at no cost. Whether you were a passenger, another driver, a pedestrian, or a cyclist hit by an Uber or Lyft driver, the same coverage analysis applies. Call before you give a statement to anyone.
Expert Legal Tip from the Attorneys at Pedram Law. The most valuable evidence in a rideshare case is the driver’s app status at the exact moment of the crash. Uber and Lyft maintain detailed logs of when drivers were logged in, when they were waiting for ride requests, when they accepted a trip, and when the trip ended. Coverage tier depends entirely on this data. The companies preserve these logs but will not produce them voluntarily. A preservation letter and discovery request through litigation are usually required. Within days of being retained, an attorney needs to send formal preservation demands to Uber or Lyft to ensure trip data, GPS records, and driver communications are not destroyed under standard retention policies. Wait too long and the data may legally be gone.
The first 72 hours determine whether the case is winnable. Avoid every one of these.
Uber, Lyft, and their third-party claims administrators are trained to extract specific phrases. These are the ones to never say.
Rideshare insurers use any delay in medical care to argue your injuries are minor or unrelated to the crash. A gap of even three or four days between the collision and your first medical visit becomes a defense argument. So does a missed follow up visit, an unfilled prescription, or a physical therapy appointment you skipped. Establish a clear, continuous medical record starting the day of the crash. If you cannot afford care, an attorney can connect you with providers who treat on a lien basis and wait for payment from the settlement.
Rideshare crash injuries mirror standard auto crash injuries in type but often appear at higher severity because rideshare drivers operate at high mileage, frequently in dense urban traffic, and during long shifts that produce driver fatigue.
Rideshare litigation is its own category. It is not a car accident case with a different defendant. The complications come from four directions at once.
Layered insurance coverage tiers. California Public Utilities Code Section 5432 establishes three distinct insurance phases for transportation network companies. Phase 1 (app off) leaves the driver under personal insurance only. Phase 2 (app on, no trip accepted) triggers a limited rideshare contingent policy with state-mandated minimums. Phase 3 (trip accepted or passenger in vehicle) triggers full $1,000,000 commercial liability coverage plus uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage. Whether your case settles for thousands or millions can depend entirely on which phase the driver was in.
Disputed app status at time of crash. Rideshare companies and their insurers routinely push to assign a lower coverage tier. Drivers may claim the app was off. Companies may dispute when a trip technically ended. The factual question of app status is decided by GPS data, trip logs, and driver communications, all of which are held by the rideshare company and not voluntarily disclosed.
Multiple liable parties. A single rideshare crash may involve the rideshare driver, the rideshare company, a third-party driver who hit the rideshare vehicle, that driver’s employer if commercial, the vehicle manufacturer if a defect contributed, and the rideshare company’s screening practices if the driver should never have been on the road. Each party carries separate insurance and separate counsel.
Corporate defense at scale. Uber and Lyft are not consumer auto insurers. They retain national defense firms, maintain teams of in-house claims professionals, and approach litigation as a strategic exercise. The defense playbook is sophisticated, well resourced, and designed to minimize payouts at scale across thousands of cases.
Statute of limitations. Under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 335.1, you have two years from the date of injury to file a personal injury lawsuit. If a government vehicle or government entity contributed to the crash, a separate administrative claim must be filed within six months. The deadlines are absolute.
Pure comparative fault. California is a pure comparative fault state. Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault but never eliminated. If your case is worth $1,000,000 and a jury finds you 20% at fault, you still recover $800,000. As a rideshare passenger, you almost never share fault, which makes coverage analysis the more important fight than fault analysis.
California Public Utilities Code Section 5432. The transportation network company statute establishes the three-tier insurance framework. Tier 1 (app off): driver’s personal auto insurance applies, with no rideshare coverage. Tier 2 (app on, waiting for ride request): a contingent policy applies, with state-mandated minimums of $50,000 per person and $100,000 per accident for bodily injury, plus $30,000 for property damage. Tier 3 (trip accepted through passenger drop-off): full $1,000,000 commercial liability coverage applies, plus uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage up to $1,000,000.
Uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage under rideshare policies. When a rideshare driver is in Tier 3 and is hit by an uninsured or underinsured driver, the rideshare UM/UIM coverage applies up to $1,000,000. This is critical when a third-party driver causes the crash but does not carry sufficient insurance to cover passenger injuries. The rideshare UM/UIM policy fills the gap.
Minimum personal insurance requirements. California Vehicle Code Section 16000 requires drivers to carry minimum liability coverage of $15,000 per person and $30,000 per accident for bodily injury, plus $5,000 for property damage. These minimums apply to a rideshare driver in Tier 1 (app off). They are routinely insufficient for serious injuries.
California Insurance Code Section 11580.2. Auto insurers must offer uninsured motorist and underinsured motorist coverage with every policy. In rideshare cases involving uninsured third-party drivers, both the rideshare UM policy and the passenger’s personal UM policy may apply, providing layered recovery.
Rideshare claims are handled by national third-party administrators that process thousands of cases. These are the tactics used against unrepresented victims.
When Pedram Law is on the case, rideshare insurers know they are dealing with a firm that pulls the data, runs the coverage analysis, and litigates when needed.
Yes. Immigration status does not affect your right to file a personal injury claim in California. State law prohibits using immigration status in personal injury cases. If you were injured in a rideshare crash as a passenger, driver, pedestrian, or cyclist, you are entitled to compensation regardless of your documentation. Silvia Gonzalez spent years in immigration court before joining Pedram Law and represents Spanish speaking clients regularly. Your status will not be raised, shared, or used against you in your civil claim.
You can still recover, often from multiple sources. The third-party driver’s insurance applies if they were at fault. If their coverage is insufficient or they were uninsured, the rideshare UM/UIM policy may apply up to $1,000,000 during a Tier 3 trip. Your own personal UM/UIM policy may also apply as a layered source. As a passenger, you almost never share fault, which simplifies the liability analysis and puts the focus on identifying every coverage source.
App status is decided by the rideshare company’s data, not the driver’s statement. GPS logs, trip records, and timestamps establish exactly when the driver was logged in and what tier applied at the moment of the crash. Drivers sometimes misstate their status because they do not want their personal insurance involved, but the company data tells the truth. An experienced attorney pulls that data through preservation letters and discovery.
Rideshare injury cases produce substantial damages because available coverage is often substantial. Recoverable categories include:
Pedram Law has recovered $1,000,000 in a slip and fall, $600,000 in a car accident, $500,000 in a wrongful death case, and significant results across catastrophic injury matters. Every case turns on its facts and on the coverage available. What stays consistent is the approach: full documentation, coverage tier analysis, hard negotiation, and trial readiness.
You do not need to have everything ready. Pedram Law will help you gather what is missing. If you have any of the following, bring it.
If you do not have these documents, call anyway. The most important step is reaching out early so we can send preservation letters and pull app data before retention windows close.
Rideshare cases require an attorney who understands the three-tier coverage framework, how to compel app data from Uber and Lyft, and how to litigate against national corporate defense teams. Most personal injury attorneys do not handle these cases well.
Has the firm handled rideshare cases specifically, including Tier 2 and Tier 3 coverage disputes? Familiarity with California Public Utilities Code Section 5432, app data preservation, and Uber and Lyft defense playbooks separates competent rideshare attorneys from general PI practitioners. Pedram Law represents rideshare crash victims across California.
Will the attorney send preservation letters to Uber or Lyft within days of being retained? Rideshare app data has retention windows. Delay favors the defense. Pedram Law moves on app data preservation immediately because the case depends on it.
Does the firm actually try rideshare cases, or settle everything quickly? Uber and Lyft track which firms litigate and adjust settlement offers accordingly. Pedram Law prepares every rideshare case as if it will go before a jury.
Does the firm have access to accident reconstruction experts, life care planners, vocational economists, and medical specialists? Rideshare injuries are frequently severe and require expert testimony to document full damages. Pedram Law retains the experts a case needs.
Will the attorney handle the case personally, or pass it to a junior associate? Nima Pedram personally handles client relationships and Silvia Gonzalez leads litigation alongside him. Both are accessible to clients throughout the case.
Pedram Law handles rideshare accident cases on contingency. No fees unless we win. Free case evaluation. No upfront costs.
Yes. Pedram Law represents victims of Uber and Lyft crashes across California, including passengers, third-party drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists hit by rideshare drivers. Rideshare cases require attorneys who understand the three-tier coverage framework under California Public Utilities Code Section 5432. We approach these cases with the specific preparation they need.
We send formal preservation letters within days of being retained. The letters demand preservation of trip data, GPS logs, driver communications, and crash reports. Speed matters because rideshare app data has retention windows and the companies do not voluntarily disclose this information.
Yes. Pedram Law prepares every rideshare case as if it will go before a jury. When rideshare insurers refuse fair value, we file and litigate. That trial readiness is the reason carriers offer serious numbers in negotiation.
Nima Pedram personally manages client relationships and Silvia Gonzalez leads litigation alongside him. Your case will not be passed to a junior associate or a case manager you have never met.
Nothing upfront. Pedram Law handles rideshare accident cases on contingency. You pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. Your initial case evaluation is free.
Two years from the date of the accident under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 335.1. If a government vehicle was involved, you have six months to file an administrative claim. Missing either deadline permanently bars your right to recover.
Coverage depends on the driver’s app status at the moment of the crash. Tier 1 (app off): driver’s personal insurance. Tier 2 (app on, waiting for ride request): a limited contingent rideshare policy. Tier 3 (trip accepted through drop-off): full $1,000,000 commercial coverage plus rideshare UM/UIM up to $1,000,000. Identifying the correct tier is critical and depends on app data held by Uber or Lyft.
The rideshare company’s commercial liability policy applies during Tier 3, up to $1,000,000. As a passenger, you almost never share fault, which means the case focuses on identifying coverage and documenting damages, not litigating fault.
The third-party driver’s insurance applies. If their coverage is insufficient or they were uninsured, the rideshare UM/UIM policy may apply up to $1,000,000 during Tier 3. Your own UM/UIM policy may also apply as a layered source.
Nothing upfront. Pedram Law handles rideshare accident cases on contingency. You pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. Your initial case evaluation is free.
Yes. California’s pure comparative fault rule reduces your damages by your percentage of fault but does not eliminate them. As a rideshare passenger, you almost never share fault. If you were the driver in another vehicle, fault analysis applies normally.
Most cases settle before trial. Pedram Law prepares every rideshare case as if it will go before a jury, which is why insurers take our demands seriously. If the insurer refuses fair value, we file and try the case.
Pedram Law represents rideshare crash victims throughout California, including Beverly Hills, Los Angeles, Long Beach, Riverside, Moreno Valley, Corona, Murrieta, Pomona, West Covina, and Garden Grove. The firm office is located at 8383 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1024, Beverly Hills, California 90211.
Pedram Law, PC
8383 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1024
Beverly Hills, CA 90211
(844) 344-4444
If you or someone you love was injured in an Uber or Lyft crash anywhere in California, Pedram Law is ready to evaluate your case at no cost and run the full coverage tier analysis. Free case evaluation. No fees unless we win.
This content has been reviewed by the attorneys at Pedram Law, PC, licensed to practice law in the State of California.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship.
Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every case is unique; please speak with an attorney to discuss your specific situation.
our wide range of practice areas
our OTHER practice areas.
we’re loved by our customers
we have helped 1000+
clients win their claims.
Book your consultation
contact pedram law, pc
Reach Out Now For a Free Consultation.
Reach out today and one of our legal experts will investigate your situation and let you know if you have a case.
Email Address
info@pedramlaw.com
Beverly Hills
8383 Wilshire Blvd, Ste 1024, Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Riverside
11801 Pierce St Suite 200 Riverside, CA 92505
Burbank
2600 W Olive Ave, 5th Floor, Burbank CA 91505
Sacramento
500 Capitol Mall, Sacramento, CA 95814
Newport Beach
4000 MacArthur Blvd, Newport Beach CA 92660
Attorney
Henry is a dedicated attorney with over 10 years of experience representing clients in complex employment and personal injury matters. Specializing in workplace disputes—including discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, wage and hour claims—and a wide range of personal injury cases such as accidents, premises liability, and catastrophic injuries, Henry will advocate tirelessly to secure justice and maximum compensation for those in need.
Licensed to practice in California, New York, Illinois, Texas, Florida, Arizona, Washington and Washington D.C., Henry brings broad multi-jurisdictional expertise to serve clients across diverse legal landscapes.
Attorney
Silvia is the proud daughter of immigrants who came to the U.S. in search of the American Dream. Through their actions and accomplishments, they ingrained in her the belief that through hard work and dedication anything is possible.
This work ethic and belief drove Silvia to accomplish many academic and professional feats. Silvia is a graduate of some of America’s most prestigious academic institutions. She received her undergraduate degree from Stanford University where she graduated with honors. She then received a masters degree from Harvard University and juris doctorate from Loyola Law School.
Prior to law school, Silvia enjoyed a successful career as a healthcare executive at a fortune 500 health insurance company. However, her successes left her unfulfilled. She wanted to use her education to make a difference in people’s lives. Specifically, to help the community she came from.
After law school, Silvia opened her own law practice dedicated to immigration law. She spent many years successfully fighting for immigrant rights in immigration court. Soon, Mrs. Gonzalez realized that she could do more. She partnered up with her colleague Nima Pedram to lead the litigation team at Pedram Law, P.C. Together they now successful represent the rights of those who have suffered personal injuries as a result of the negligence of others.
Attorney
Attorney Nima Pedram is a founding partner of Pedram Law P.C. Nima has spent his entire legal career representing people who have been harmed by negligence of other people. He zealously fights for those who have suffered catastrophic injuries because of the carelessness of others, and for those who have lost loved ones because of another’s negligence, fraudulent conduct, and/or greed. Nima works tirelessly and aggressively to obtain just outcomes for his clients.
Nima received his undergraduate degree from the University of Southern California with a major in International Relations Global Business. Nima earned his law degree from Loyola Law School – Los Angeles where he worked simultaneously at JPMorgan as Vice President of Private Banking.
Nima resolved to become a personal injury attorney after he suffered a severe injury when he was hit by a negligent motorist. After months of rehabilitation and recovery from this incident, Nima vowed that he would champion the rights of those similarly situated. As a result of his personal experiences, Nima not only sees personal injury law as his vocation, but as his calling.
