welcome to PEDRRAM LAW, PLC.
at pedram law, losing is not an option
A motorcycle accident attorney investigates the crash, preserves your bike and gear as evidence, retains accident reconstruction experts to defeat anti-motorcycle bias, identifies every source of insurance coverage, and fights for the full value of injuries that are typically catastrophic. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, motorcyclists are nearly 22 times more likely to die in a crash than passenger vehicle occupants, and California consistently ranks among the top states for motorcycle fatalities.
Most motorcycle crash victims have no idea the insurance industry approaches their case with built-in assumptions about reckless riding. By the time they call an attorney, the defense narrative has already taken hold. You do not have to figure this out alone.
Pedram Law represents serious injury victims of motorcycle crashes across California on a contingency basis. Nima Pedram and Silvia Gonzalez have recovered $1,000,000 in a slip and fall, $600,000 in a car accident, $500,000 in a wrongful death case, and significant results across catastrophic injury matters statewide. Free case evaluation. No fees unless we win.
our wide range of practice areas
WHAT WE CAN OFFER YOU.
Get in touch today and an experienced Pedram Law attorney will help you receive the.
Contact UsGet in touch today and an experienced Pedram Law attorney will help you receive the.
Contact UsGet in touch today and an experienced Pedram Law attorney will help you receive the.
Contact UsGet in touch today and an experienced Pedram Law attorney will help you receive the.
Contact UsGet in touch today and an experienced Pedram Law attorney will help you receive the.
Contact UsGet in touch today and an experienced Pedram Law attorney will help you receive the.
Contact Us
at pedram law, losing is not an option
at pedram law, losing is not an option
Yes, almost always. Motorcycle accidents produce two problems other crashes don’t. The first is the injuries, which are routinely catastrophic because there is no metal shell between you and the road. The second is the bias. Insurance adjusters, defense attorneys, and even jurors approach motorcycle cases with built-in assumptions that the rider was speeding, lane splitting recklessly, or otherwise at fault simply for being on a bike. Without an attorney pushing back on those assumptions with evidence, the case settles for a fraction of what it should.
Pedram Law evaluates every motorcycle accident case at no cost. If you were hit by a car, truck, or rideshare driver and suffered any injury beyond minor road rash, call before you give a statement to anyone. The first 72 hours matter more in motorcycle cases than in almost any other type of crash.
Expert Legal Tip from the Attorneys at Pedram Law. The most common defense tactic in motorcycle cases is to argue the rider was lane splitting recklessly or speeding, even when neither claim is supported by the evidence. The defense will push this narrative regardless of facts, hoping it sticks with adjusters and jurors who already carry bias against motorcyclists. The best counter is documentary evidence preserved early: the bike in unrepaired condition, your helmet and gear, dashcam footage from your own bike or nearby vehicles, and witness statements taken before memories fade. Lane splitting is legal in California. Riders are not required to wear specific gear beyond a helmet. Letting the defense control the narrative because you waited too long to act is the single most common reason motorcycle cases settle for less than they should.
The first 72 hours determine whether the case is winnable. Avoid every one of these.
Adjusters are trained to extract specific phrases from motorcycle riders. Anti-bike bias makes these phrases more damaging than they would be in a car case.
Insurers use any delay in medical care to argue your injuries are minor or unrelated to the crash. In motorcycle cases, the bias against riders amplifies this tactic. A gap of even three or four days between the crash and your first medical visit becomes a defense argument that you were never really hurt. So does a missed follow up visit, an unfilled prescription, or a physical therapy appointment you skipped. Establish a clear, continuous medical record starting the day of the crash. If you cannot afford care, an attorney can connect you with providers who treat on a lien basis and wait for payment from the settlement.
Motorcyclists absorb the full force of a collision without the protection of a vehicle frame, airbags, or seat belts. The injuries that result are typically more severe than those in any other type of motor vehicle crash.
Motorcycle litigation looks straightforward but is one of the most contested categories of personal injury work. The complications come from four directions at once.
Anti-motorcycle bias. Insurance adjusters, defense attorneys, and jurors carry built-in assumptions that motorcyclists are reckless. Defense teams exploit this bias aggressively, framing every case as rider negligence regardless of the actual facts. Overcoming bias requires documentary evidence preserved early and an attorney willing to confront it head on at trial.
Disputed fault under comparative negligence. California’s pure comparative fault rule reduces recovery by the rider’s percentage of fault. In motorcycle cases, defense teams routinely inflate the rider’s fault percentage by 20 to 40 points beyond what the evidence supports. Without an attorney pushing back with reconstruction analysis, witness statements, and physical evidence, that inflated number becomes the settlement reduction.
Lane splitting and helmet law arguments. Lane splitting is legal in California under Vehicle Code Section 21658.1, but defense teams still argue it as reckless behavior. California Vehicle Code Section 27803 requires riders to wear helmets, but failure to wear a helmet does not bar recovery. Under pure comparative fault, it may reduce compensation for head and brain injuries specifically. It does not affect claims for other injury types. These nuances get argued in every motorcycle case.
Rapid evidence loss. Surveillance footage overwrites within 30 to 90 days. Witnesses move and forget. The motorcycle gets crushed. The other vehicle gets repaired. Skid marks fade. Every category of evidence that proves rider innocence or driver fault disappears on a schedule, and that schedule favors the defense unless someone is fighting back.
Statute of limitations. Under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 335.1, you have two years from the date of injury to file a personal injury lawsuit. If a government vehicle or government entity was involved, a separate administrative claim must be filed within six months. The deadlines are absolute. Do not assume an exception applies without an attorney confirming it.
Pure comparative fault. California is a pure comparative fault state. Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault but never eliminated. If your case is worth $1,000,000 and a jury finds you 25% at fault, you still recover $750,000. You can file a claim even if you are 99% at fault. In motorcycle cases, the defense pushes hard to inflate fault percentages. An attorney with motorcycle experience pushes back.
Lane splitting. California Vehicle Code Section 21658.1 permits lane splitting and authorizes the California Highway Patrol to develop educational guidelines. Lane splitting is legal in California, period. Defense teams who argue otherwise are wrong on the law, but they argue it anyway. Witnesses, dashcam footage, and reconstruction analysis defeat these arguments when an attorney builds the case properly.
Helmet law. California Vehicle Code Section 27803 requires both riders and passengers to wear helmets that meet DOT standards. Failure to wear a helmet does not bar recovery. Under pure comparative fault, the absence of a helmet may reduce compensation for head and brain injuries specifically, but it has no effect on claims for spinal injuries, orthopedic trauma, internal injuries, road rash, or any other non-head injury. Defense teams frequently misrepresent this rule to extract larger fault reductions than the law actually permits.
Minimum insurance requirements. California Vehicle Code Section 16000 requires drivers to carry minimum liability coverage of $15,000 per person and $30,000 per accident for bodily injury, plus $5,000 for property damage. These minimums are frequently insufficient for motorcycle injuries. When the at fault driver’s policy will not cover your full damages, identifying every additional source of recovery becomes critical.
Uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage. California Insurance Code Section 11580.2 requires auto insurers to offer uninsured motorist and underinsured motorist coverage with every policy. If you were hit by a driver with no insurance or insufficient insurance, your own UM or UIM coverage applies. Hit and run accidents may be covered under UM policies. Even claims against your own insurer get disputed, so do not assume your insurer will pay fairly without representation.
Insurers approach motorcycle cases differently than car cases. The anti-bike bias makes these tactics more aggressive and more effective when nobody is pushing back.
When Pedram Law is on the case, insurers know they are dealing with a firm that confronts anti-motorcycle bias directly and tries cases when they need to be tried.
Yes. Immigration status does not affect your right to file a personal injury claim in California. State law prohibits using immigration status in personal injury cases. If a negligent driver injured you while you were riding, you are entitled to compensation regardless of your documentation. Silvia Gonzalez spent years in immigration court before joining Pedram Law and represents Spanish speaking clients regularly. Your status will not be raised, shared, or used against you in your civil claim.
You can still recover. California’s pure comparative fault rule reduces your damages by your percentage of fault but does not eliminate them. In motorcycle cases, defense teams routinely inflate the rider’s fault percentage. Reconstruction analysis, witness statements, and physical evidence are how an experienced attorney pushes back. Many riders assume partial fault means no case and walk away from substantial compensation.
You can still recover. California Vehicle Code Section 27803 requires helmets, but the absence of a helmet does not bar your claim. Under pure comparative fault, it may reduce compensation for head and brain injuries specifically. It does not affect recovery for spinal injuries, orthopedic trauma, internal injuries, road rash, or any other non-head injury. Defense teams misrepresent this rule constantly. An attorney with motorcycle experience knows where the law actually draws the line.
Motorcycle injury cases produce substantial damages because the injuries are typically catastrophic. Recoverable categories include:
Pedram Law has recovered $1,000,000 in a slip and fall, $600,000 in a car accident, $500,000 in a wrongful death case, and significant results across catastrophic injury matters. Every case turns on its facts. What stays consistent is the approach: full documentation, hard negotiation, and trial readiness.
You do not need to have everything ready. Pedram Law will help you gather what is missing. If you have any of the following, bring it.
If you do not have these documents, call anyway. The most important step is reaching out early so we can preserve the motorcycle, your gear, and other evidence before it disappears or gets disposed of.
Motorcycle cases require an attorney willing to confront anti-bike bias directly. Most personal injury attorneys do not approach these cases differently from car accidents, which is why riders settle for less than they should. Slow down and work through these categories before signing anything.
Has the firm specifically handled motorcycle cases, or does it treat them like car accidents? Familiarity with lane splitting law, helmet law nuances, and anti-motorcycle bias is what separates competent motorcycle attorneys from general PI practitioners. Pedram Law represents motorcycle riders across California and approaches these cases with the specific preparation they require.
Does the firm actually try motorcycle cases, or settle everything quickly? Insurers offer more on motorcycle cases when they know the firm will go to trial. Pedram Law prepares every motorcycle case as if it will go before a jury, which is why our settlements consistently exceed initial offers.
Does the firm have access to accident reconstruction experts, life care planners, and medical specialists? Motorcycle cases frequently turn on reconstruction analysis to defeat anti-bike narratives. Pedram Law retains the experts a case needs.
Will the attorney handle the case personally, or pass it to a junior associate? Nima Pedram personally handles client relationships and Silvia Gonzalez leads litigation alongside him. Both are accessible to clients throughout the case.
Pedram Law handles motorcycle accident cases on contingency. No fees unless we win. Free case evaluation. No upfront costs.
Yes. Pedram Law represents motorcycle riders across California. Motorcycle cases require attorneys who understand lane splitting law, helmet law nuances, and the anti-bike bias that affects adjusters and juries. We approach these cases with the specific preparation they need from the first call.
Lane splitting is legal in California under Vehicle Code Section 21658.1. The absence of a helmet does not bar recovery and only affects compensation for head injuries specifically. We confront defense arguments on these issues directly with the statute, with reconstruction analysis, and with witness evidence. Defense teams misrepresent these laws routinely. We hold them to what the law actually says.
Yes. Pedram Law prepares every motorcycle case as if it will go before a jury. When insurers refuse fair value, we file and litigate. That trial readiness is the reason insurers offer serious numbers in negotiation.
Nima Pedram personally manages client relationships and Silvia Gonzalez leads litigation alongside him. Your case will not be passed to a junior associate or a case manager you have never met.
Nothing upfront. Pedram Law handles motorcycle accident cases on contingency. You pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. Your initial case evaluation is free.
Two years from the date of the accident under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 335.1. If the at fault vehicle was a government vehicle, you have six months to file an administrative claim with the responsible government entity. Missing either deadline permanently bars your right to recover.
Yes. California Vehicle Code Section 21658.1 permits lane splitting and authorizes the California Highway Patrol to develop educational guidelines. Defense teams in motorcycle cases routinely argue lane splitting was reckless, but the practice is legal in California. An experienced motorcycle attorney defeats these arguments with the statute and the evidence.
Yes. California Vehicle Code Section 27803 requires helmets, but the absence of a helmet does not bar your claim. Under pure comparative fault, it may reduce compensation for head and brain injuries specifically. It does not affect recovery for spinal injuries, orthopedic trauma, internal injuries, road rash, or other non-head injuries.
Nothing upfront. Pedram Law handles motorcycle accident cases on contingency. You pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. Your initial case evaluation is free.
California requires drivers to carry minimum liability insurance, but many do not. Your own uninsured motorist coverage may apply. If the at fault driver had insurance but it is insufficient to cover your damages, your underinsured motorist coverage may bridge the gap. Hit and run cases are often covered under UM policies. Pedram Law identifies every available source of recovery.
Yes. California’s pure comparative fault rule reduces your damages by your percentage of fault but does not eliminate them. In motorcycle cases, defense teams routinely inflate the rider’s fault percentage. We push back with reconstruction analysis and evidence.
Most cases settle before trial. Pedram Law prepares every motorcycle case as if it will go before a jury, which is why insurers take our demands seriously. If the insurer refuses fair value, we file and try the case.
Pedram Law represents motorcycle accident victims throughout California, including Beverly Hills, Los Angeles, Long Beach, Riverside, Moreno Valley, Corona, Murrieta, Pomona, West Covina, and Garden Grove. The firm office is located at 8383 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1024, Beverly Hills, California 90211.
Pedram Law, PC
8383 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1024
Beverly Hills, CA 90211
(844) 344-4444
If you or someone you love was injured in a motorcycle accident anywhere in California, Pedram Law is ready to evaluate your case at no cost and confront the anti-motorcycle bias head on. Free case evaluation. No fees unless we win.
This content has been reviewed by the attorneys at Pedram Law, PC, licensed to practice law in the State of California.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship.
{
“@context”: “https://schema.org”,
“@type”: “LegalService”,
“name”: “Pedram Law, PC”,
“legalName”: “Pedram Law, PC”,
“url”: “https://www.pedramlaw.com/motorcycle-accident-attorney/”,
“telephone”: “+1-844-344-4444”,
“address”: {
“@type”: “PostalAddress”,
“streetAddress”: “8383 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1024”,
“addressLocality”: “Beverly Hills”,
“addressRegion”: “CA”,
“postalCode”: “90211”,
“addressCountry”: “US”
},
“openingHours”: “Mo-Su 00:00-23:59”,
“priceRange”: “Free consultation. No fee unless we win.”,
“description”: “California motorcycle accident attorneys representing injured riders statewide on a contingency basis. Free case evaluation. No fees unless we win.”,
“areaServed”: {
“@type”: “State”,
“name”: “California”
},
“hasMap”: “https://www.google.com/maps?cid=110118461796647449”,
“paymentAccepted”: “Contingency fee”,
“currenciesAccepted”: “USD”,
“serviceType”: “Motorcycle Accident Attorney”,
“jurisdiction”: “California”
}
{
“@context”: “https://schema.org”,
“@type”: “FAQPage”,
“mainEntity”: [
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “How long do I have to file a motorcycle accident lawsuit in California?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “Two years from the date of the accident under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 335.1. If the at fault vehicle was a government vehicle, you have six months to file an administrative claim with the responsible government entity. Missing either deadline permanently bars your right to recover.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “Is lane splitting legal in California?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “Yes. California Vehicle Code Section 21658.1 permits lane splitting and authorizes the California Highway Patrol to develop educational guidelines. Defense teams routinely argue lane splitting was reckless, but the practice is legal in California.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “Can I recover if I was not wearing a helmet?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “Yes. California Vehicle Code Section 27803 requires helmets, but the absence of a helmet does not bar your claim. Under pure comparative fault, it may reduce compensation for head and brain injuries specifically. It does not affect recovery for spinal injuries, orthopedic trauma, internal injuries, road rash, or other non-head injuries.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “How much does it cost to hire a motorcycle accident attorney at Pedram Law?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “Nothing upfront. Pedram Law handles motorcycle accident cases on contingency. You pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. Your initial case evaluation is free.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “What if the driver who hit me had no insurance?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “California requires drivers to carry minimum liability insurance, but many do not. Your own uninsured motorist coverage may apply. If the at fault driver had insurance but it is insufficient, your underinsured motorist coverage may bridge the gap. Hit and run cases are often covered under UM policies.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “Can I still file if the accident was partly my fault?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “Yes. California’s pure comparative fault rule reduces your damages by your percentage of fault but does not eliminate them. In motorcycle cases, defense teams routinely inflate the rider’s fault percentage. We push back with reconstruction analysis and evidence.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “Do I have to go to court for a motorcycle accident claim?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “Most cases settle before trial. Pedram Law prepares every motorcycle case as if it will go before a jury, which is why insurers take our demands seriously. If the insurer refuses fair value, we file and try the case.”
}
}
]
}
Disclaimer: This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every case is unique; please speak with an attorney to discuss your specific situation.
our wide range of practice areas
our OTHER practice areas.
we’re loved by our customers
we have helped 1000+
clients win their claims.
Book your consultation
contact pedram law, pc
Reach Out Now For a Free Consultation.
Reach out today and one of our legal experts will investigate your situation and let you know if you have a case.
Email Address
info@pedramlaw.com
Beverly Hills
8383 Wilshire Blvd, Ste 1024, Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Riverside
11801 Pierce St Suite 200 Riverside, CA 92505
Burbank
2600 W Olive Ave, 5th Floor, Burbank CA 91505
Sacramento
500 Capitol Mall, Sacramento, CA 95814
Newport Beach
4000 MacArthur Blvd, Newport Beach CA 92660
Attorney
Henry is a dedicated attorney with over 10 years of experience representing clients in complex employment and personal injury matters. Specializing in workplace disputes—including discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination, wage and hour claims—and a wide range of personal injury cases such as accidents, premises liability, and catastrophic injuries, Henry will advocate tirelessly to secure justice and maximum compensation for those in need.
Licensed to practice in California, New York, Illinois, Texas, Florida, Arizona, Washington and Washington D.C., Henry brings broad multi-jurisdictional expertise to serve clients across diverse legal landscapes.
Attorney
Silvia is the proud daughter of immigrants who came to the U.S. in search of the American Dream. Through their actions and accomplishments, they ingrained in her the belief that through hard work and dedication anything is possible.
This work ethic and belief drove Silvia to accomplish many academic and professional feats. Silvia is a graduate of some of America’s most prestigious academic institutions. She received her undergraduate degree from Stanford University where she graduated with honors. She then received a masters degree from Harvard University and juris doctorate from Loyola Law School.
Prior to law school, Silvia enjoyed a successful career as a healthcare executive at a fortune 500 health insurance company. However, her successes left her unfulfilled. She wanted to use her education to make a difference in people’s lives. Specifically, to help the community she came from.
After law school, Silvia opened her own law practice dedicated to immigration law. She spent many years successfully fighting for immigrant rights in immigration court. Soon, Mrs. Gonzalez realized that she could do more. She partnered up with her colleague Nima Pedram to lead the litigation team at Pedram Law, P.C. Together they now successful represent the rights of those who have suffered personal injuries as a result of the negligence of others.
Attorney
Attorney Nima Pedram is a founding partner of Pedram Law P.C. Nima has spent his entire legal career representing people who have been harmed by negligence of other people. He zealously fights for those who have suffered catastrophic injuries because of the carelessness of others, and for those who have lost loved ones because of another’s negligence, fraudulent conduct, and/or greed. Nima works tirelessly and aggressively to obtain just outcomes for his clients.
Nima received his undergraduate degree from the University of Southern California with a major in International Relations Global Business. Nima earned his law degree from Loyola Law School – Los Angeles where he worked simultaneously at JPMorgan as Vice President of Private Banking.
Nima resolved to become a personal injury attorney after he suffered a severe injury when he was hit by a negligent motorist. After months of rehabilitation and recovery from this incident, Nima vowed that he would champion the rights of those similarly situated. As a result of his personal experiences, Nima not only sees personal injury law as his vocation, but as his calling.
